Pest Control

A conversation from a few weeks ago—

Me: I found three millipedes in the house this morning. I couldn’t bear to kill them, so I threw them outside.

Hubby: Don’t do that!

Me: Why not?

Hubby: Because those ones already know how to get in, and they’ll tell the others!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Tools of the Trade

Here, perhaps, the reason why I get so little writing done.

“It is certainly necessary for a writer to have ideas in his head,” agreed Poirot.

from Death in the Air

Posted in Reading, The Weekly Poirot | Leave a comment

A Rainbow of Reading

I have decided that August will be Rainbow of Reading Month. That is, for the entire month of August, I will only read books that have colors in their titles. I will count words like “plum” and “chocolate” as colors, whether or not they were used in that sense in the title, because it suits my love of wordplay.

Some titles I’m considering:

  • White Noise
  • On the Banks of Plum Creek
  • David Copperfield
  • The White Deer
  • Children of Green Knowe
  • Island of the Blue Dolphins
  • Where the Red Fern Grows
  • The Witch of Blackbird Pond
  • James and the Giant Peach
  • Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
  • Forever in Blue: The Fourth Summer of the Sisterhood

I might also go to the library and pick out some books based purely on their titles. Who knows what colorful gems I might discover!

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Portuguese-By-Marriage

Growing up, I always thought I would marry an Italian. I lived in Connecticut, just north of New Haven, and there, as my friend once put it, you are either Italian or married to an Italian. But I moved to Rhode Island. Here in my new hometown, you are either Portuguese and/or named Mike. I was not named Mike, so I married a Portuguese man. Now I am Portuguese-by-marriage.

When I married into a Portuguese family, I didn’t know what to expect.  The first thing I noticed was their fondness for food, particularly seafood. Personally, I don’t mind a little bacalhao every once in a while, but I get tired of having to pull shellfish, which I don’t like, out of every other dish. I also love dessert, but I don’t need a dozen different desserts at every family gathering. Unless we’re talking baked custards. Or biscoito. Or popovers.

Arg! The Portuguese are making me fat!

Arg! And all that seafood is making me talk like a pirate!

But as much as I love the Portuguese, not to mention their witty sayings (e.g., “The sheets make the peace”), there are times when they’re just plain silly. Take my father-in-law’s obsession with all things Portuguese. He goes on and on about the simplest things that he used to enjoy in Portugal. He seems to imply that if those things are also available here in the U.S., it is only because the Portuguese people made them first.

My husband and I have created a running gag out of this idea, expanding and reinterpreting it to mean that everything in the world was invented by (or first discovered by) the Portuguese. So, for example, if one of us were to remark that the piano sounded nice, the other might say, “Did you know that the Portuguese invented the piano?” And the proper reply would be, “Yes, I know. They did that right after they invented music!”

This gag has nearly gotten me in trouble on several occasions. For example, at my sister-in-law’s wedding shower, we girls were discussing where one might take a dress to get it altered, when my mother-in-law mentioned that there used to be a tailoring shop nearby with a Portuguese seamstress. She went on and on about how good the seamstress was, even after being told that the tailoring shop was long gone. I had to bite my tongue to keep myself from saying, “Hey, did you know that the Portuguese invented sewing? Yeah, that was right after they invented cloth!”

In addition to such fun games, there are other positives to being Portuguese-by-marriage. It connects me and my children, however nebulously, with the spirit of exploration (Vasco da Gama, Ferdinand Magellan), philosophy (Baruch Spinoza), and “Who Wants to Be a Millionaire” (Meredith Vieira). We, the Portuguese, have great music (Fado), a popular language (over 200 million speakers), and a multitude of wines. We are many, we are proud, and we polka!

Well, some people polka. I may be Portuguese-by-marriage, but my feet are still American-by-birth. I don’t dance much, but maybe my kids will learn how to polka someday.

I sometimes look at my life and wonder how I got here. This Portuguese-by-marriage life is not what I envisioned when I was a child. But back then I hadn’t met my husband yet, and I had no idea how attractive, loving, and wonderful the Portuguese could be. I’m glad I found out.

Posted in Crazy Me | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Obstacles

Is it any wonder that I don’t play my piano often? There are so many obstacles in my way. First, the situation has to be just right. The children must be either out of the house or soundly asleep, and my husband must not be in the living room watching TV.

Then, to get the piano ready, I have to move the clutter that has accumulated on it. Grr! When my husband first started putting things on my piano, I told him to cut it out. But there’s nowhere else to put things, such as the remote control for the TV, so that Marshall can’t reach. That’s why my husband puts stuff there and why, though it makes me angry, I put up with it.

Next, I have to pull back or remove the cover. We keep the piano covered so that the cats can’t do any damage to it. We know they would eventually harm it. If they couldn’t scratch it, they’d find a way to get their puke into it.

Then I have to fetch the key to unlock the piano. Once Marshall learned how to open up the keyboard, I had to start locking it. Can’t you just imagine him stuffing Cheerios between the keys and pouring milk over them? I can! That’s why I lock it.

I also have to move the piano bench in from the kitchen. Marshall figured out that he could pull the bench from under the piano and use it to reach the stuff on top of the piano (and also to climb onto the piano—yikes!). So I had to start storing the bench in the kitchen, where he can’t get to it.

Last but not least, I have to be in the mood.

Geez! It practically requires a special planetary alignment for me to play!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Marshall, Music, and Mommy

Dear Marshall,

Of the many things I hope for you, a love of music is one of the most important. I don’t necessarily want to turn you into a Juilliard-trained instrumentalist. Not that it would be a bad thing, but it’s not for everyone, and I’m not going to push you down that road unless it’s right for you.

No, what I really want is for you to love music so that it will always be there for you as a source of joy, entertainment, healing—whatever you need from it. I want you to feel comfortable making music, too, whether with your voice or your hands, or just tapping your toes. I also hope you’ll be able to dance without being self-conscious about it.

Your musical progression so far:

  • I sang to you often when you were an itty-bitty baby. It calmed you during the nights when you would cry.
  • When you got a little older, we sometimes played a game in which we’d sing single notes back and forth. Well, I’d sing and you’d sort of shout, but it was cute. As you improved, the game became more complex, and we’d sing multiple notes (for example, “Nah nah nah NAH,” as in Beethoven’s “Fifth”).
  • I hope I never forget that time in your father’s office when you danced like mad to “Heart of Rock and Roll” by Huey Lewis and the News.
  • Last Christmas, I sang “Jingle Bells” to you over and over again because you liked it so much. Just a few weeks ago, I was changing your diaper, and you started to hum the song. You probably weren’t even aware that you were doing it. I was amazed that you remembered so much of it! So when I finished the diaper change, I sang the song to you, and you started doing a silly “dance,” running around in a circle. At the end of the song, you said, “Agan! Agan! Agan!” This quickly became a favorite game. After several rounds, you would get so dizzy you could barely walk, but you’d stumble around going, “Agan!” I caught the whole thing on video, so we’ll be able to show it to all your friends when you’re older. Mother’s prerogative. 😉
  • Recently, you switched favorites. Now you request “Row, Row, Row Your Boat.” You can sing the first line (“Row, row, row your boat”). You ignore the part that goes, “Gently down the stream.” Next is “Mooey, mooey” for “Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily, life is but a dream.” Then you say, “Agan!”

I wonder what our next musical game will be. Whatever it is, I can’t wait to play it agan and agan.

Love,

Mom

Posted in Baby, Dear Marshall | Tagged | Leave a comment

Saying It Like It Is

Poirot was typically kind, but he wasn’t afraid to speak his mind. I wish I had the chutzpah to say this to someone’s face, as he did in Murder on the Orient Express.

If you will forgive me for being personal—I do not like your face.

In the story, Poirot gave that as a reason for rejecting someone’s case, but I think it would be applicable in many situations.

Posted in Reading, The Weekly Poirot | Leave a comment

Reading Roundup

I don’t have much time to talk about the books I’ve read this year, but I don’t want to leave them completely unmentioned, so here are a few words about the ones I haven’t covered yet.

Murder on the Orient Express by Agatha Christie
Grade: A-

Murder on the Orient Express isn’t one of Christie’s best. I read it a while ago, but as I recall, the description is terse, the formula obvious, and the dialogue rather dull and procedural. But the setting is perfect (a snowbound train), the murder itself is interesting, and of course, Hercule Poirot is as awesome as ever. A must-read for fans of Christie and fans of the genre but perhaps not for others.

Skippy Dies by Paul Murray
Grade: A+

Because I look up to authors, I expect them to be older than I. Paul Murray is actually younger. Younger, but perhaps wiser. Certainly a better writer. He really knows his way around a simile, and when he describes a thing, you see it, hear it, feel it. I can’t remember ever admiring anyone’s prose more.

The premise of Skippy Dies is simple. A young student at a Catholic boarding school dies. Then the author tells you how it came to be so.

Though Skippy Dies is advertised as a comedy, it is at heart a tragedy, a sad story filled with drugs, violence, and sexual abuse. Because of that, I cannot recommend it for all, but for those who can stomach reading about the darker side of modern life, this is a rich, beautifully described story with memorable characters.

A Share in Death and Leave the Grave Green by Deborah Crombie
Grade: B- for each

I am very conscious of the fact that authors are real people and that criticism sometimes hurts, even when it comes from complete strangers, and even when those strangers are not necessarily qualified to make such judgments. So I’ll say sorry in advance. (Sorry!)

With all due respect for the author’s success, I don’t think this series is very good. My expectations were high, having heard of Crombie’s mystery series, of which A Share in Death is the first book, from another blogger with an intense love of reading and a fondness for mysteries in particular. Those high expectations might have been part of the problem. Having just read Skippy Dies, which might be one of those books that stands the test of time and is eventually hailed as a classic, probably didn’t help either.

The writing is tolerable but not great. Many descriptions (particularly the descriptions of various car trips) sound like they were created using an atlas or other reference material. I also had the hardest time separating my irritation over a particular scene in A Share in Death from my opinion of the book as a whole. In that scene, the detective goes to a suspect’s apartment to question her again, and he finds her disheveled and upset. Her lover had just previously struck her in the face and forced sex on her. She repeatedly states that she was not a willing participant. In my book, that’s assault and rape. You’d think that one of Scotland Yard’s superintendents would at least tell the woman that she has the right to press charges against her assailant. Or counsel her to go to the hospital. But no, he just continues with his line of questioning and then leaves. That’s not right, not morally, and not given his profession. And it is especially jarring because he’s ordinarily so incredibly touchy-feely.

Who is this this detective, this Duncan Kinkaid? I don’t know. The author frequently describes his clothes and his car but rarely gives us any solid character traits for us to latch onto. I cannot envision him. I cannot appreciate his method (for he seems to have none but the basic “run around and ask a lot of questions” technique). I cannot laugh at him or see myself in him. The only things I remember about him are that he’s young (unusually young for a Scotland Yard superintendent), he’s divorced, he likes beer, he thinks about his feelings quite often, and he falls for women easily.

If you’re going to base a whole series of books on one particular character, it had better be a strong character! Hercule Poirot was a Belgian with peculiar habits, a glorious mustache, extreme vanity, and a firm belief in the power of the “little grey cells.” He was unique, interesting, memorable. Miss Marple was a busybody, an expert on village life, a woman with a keen understanding of human nature. No one expected that little old lady to know anything, but she was unexpectedly clever and therefore memorable. Duncan Kinkaid is not memorable (his sergeant is a little memorable—too bad she turns into a nitwit when she falls for him romantically).

If Crombie, in dwelling on Kinkaid’s outfits, had at least given him an article of clothing as unique as Indiana Jones’s hat or, more aptly, Columbo’s raincoat, then it would be relevant and interesting. But unless he’s wearing something special, I couldn’t care less about his wardrobe. And that time when he got turned on by one of the suspects and wished he had been wearing pants that would better camouflage his erection? Ugh.

In desperate need for a simple, easily-devoured book, I finished the first novel, enjoying it just barely enough to continue to a second (Leave the Grave Green). The second was no better. I tried to read the next one after that but couldn’t take the rapid nosedive into cheesy-romance-novel territory. It was beyond redemption within the first 50 pages. Ugh again. That book plus a fourth, both of which I borrowed from the library “just in case,” will go back unread.

Is it possible that 99% of mysteries are poorly written? Because having encountered so many bad ones, I’m beginning to wonder.

The Wonderful O by James Thurber
Grade: A-

Clever, clever, clever. No one was cleverer than James Thurber. He had an amazing ear for language, and his children’s books are both well-crafted and unique. The Wonderful O is as clever as any of his books, perhaps too much so. After a while, the wordplay disrupts the flow of the story to the point that it gets a little tedious. Still, a remarkable book, definitely worth reading for fans of Thurber and those who love language and wordplay.

Small Steps by Louis Sachar
Grade: B-

I loved Holes, an earlier novel of Sachar’s. Small Steps is not quite a sequel, but it does feature a couple of characters from that book. I therefore expected it to have the magic of Holes. It didn’t.

Here’s what happens. The main character, Armpit, mishears the lyrics of a pop song. He thinks it sounds like the singer is asking for his help. He ends up meeting the singer and eventually she does need his help.

If Sachar had managed to focus on the magic in that idea (and it is there), he could have woven it through the novel as he did in Holes. But he didn’t and the results are poor. I don’t recommend this book.

Posted in Reading | 1 Comment

Old Letters, Old Age

Poirot says,

“Oh, la la, never does a woman destroy a letter if she can avoid it! Not even if it would be more prudent to do so!”

from “The Adventure of ‘The Western Star'”

After reading this quote, I went searching through my Memory Box for an old love letter someone gave me once upon a time. I could not find it. Did I throw it away? It seems unlikely, though I did once rip up a different love letter. Destroying that letter seemed prudent at the time, but I think it was ultimately a mistake. I would really get a kick out of reading it today if I could.

Digging through my Memory Box, I found many other letters, cards, journals, and various mementos. It made me realize again how much of my past I have forgotten. I have talked many times about trying to write my memories down. I hope I can find the time someday soon, before the fog of Age takes even more of them away from me.

Posted in Crazy Me, Memories, Reading, The Weekly Poirot | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Sugar High

Dear Marshall,

At your birthday party, you ate cake. You’re not used to so much sugar, and later you were acting crazy. You even kicked your sister a couple of times and we said, “He usually doesn’t act like that!” Your grandfather said, under his breath, “In sucrose veritas.” I turned to him and said, “Hey, I speak pseudo-Latin and I know what that means!” He just laughed. For the record, it means, “In sugar there is truth.” Or, to put it another way, “Sugar makes you act the way you really feel.”

True, you have been a little resentful of Livia lately. Now that she’s mobile, she’s often in your way. Worse yet, she tries to play with your toys and eat your books. You must be thinking, “Hey, no one gets to eat my books but me!”

Sorry, Sweetie, but you’re going to have to share. You’ll be thankful later in life to have such a wonderful sister. I’m sure of it.

In the meantime, stay off the sugar!

Love,

Mom

Posted in Baby, Dear Marshall | Leave a comment